Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Sockeye Red Salmon vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Sockeye Red Salmon and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Sockeye Red Salmon

Oncorhynchus nerka

100Density Points

206 kcalCalories

25.4gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

100Density Points

146 kcalCalories

20.5gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Sockeye Red Salmon

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet206 kcal vs 146 kcal (difference of 41%)

Higher protein density: Sockeye Red Salmon25.4g vs 20.5g (Sockeye Red Salmon has 24% more)

Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g

Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0

Higher overall vitamin density: Sockeye Red SalmonCumulative Daily Value percentage: 276% vs 16%

Higher overall mineral density: Sockeye Red SalmonCumulative Daily Value percentage: 102% vs 66%

Sockeye Red Salmon

Oncorhynchus nerka

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

Nutrient / Metric	Sockeye Red Salmon (100g)	Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g)
Calories	206 kcal	146 kcal
Protein	25.4g	20.5g
Fats	11.5g	6.2g
Carbohydrates	0g	0g
Dietary Fiber	0g	0g
GIGlycemic Index	0	0
Water Content	64.5%	70%

Nutritional Verdict

Both superfoods are highly complementary and offer balanced biological profiles for clinical dietary plans.

Sockeye Red Salmon

Sockeye red salmon is a nutrient-dense fish known for its rich flavor and vibrant color. It is an excellent source of high-quality protein, omega-3 fatty acids, and essential vitamins and minerals.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which are beneficial for heart health and can help reduce inflammation.

•High in protein, supporting muscle growth and repair, making it an excellent choice for athletes and active individuals.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.

•High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support cardiovascular health and reduce inflammation.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Sockeye Red Salmon provides 206 calories per 100g, compared to 146 calories in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. This makes Sockeye Red Salmon more energy-dense, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out for its lower caloric footprint.

In the protein matrix, Sockeye Red Salmon delivers 25.4g of protein per 100g, while Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet records 20.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Sockeye Red Salmon offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Sockeye Red Salmon has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Sockeye Red Salmon features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Sockeye Red Salmon's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-d (570IU, 143% VDR) and vitamin-b12 (3.2µg, 133% VDR) and selenium (36.5µg, 66% VDR).

Conversely, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out especially in: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Sockeye Red Salmon: 100/100 vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Sockeye Red Salmon because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Sockeye Red Salmon and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.