Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet vs Arctic Char

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet and Arctic Char. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

100Density Points

146 kcalCalories

20.5gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Arctic Char

Salvelinus alpinus

100Density Points

140 kcalCalories

20gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Arctic Char

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Arctic Char146 kcal vs 140 kcal (difference of 4%)

Higher protein density: Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet20.5g vs 20g (Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 3% more)

Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g

Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0

Higher overall vitamin density: Arctic CharCumulative Daily Value percentage: 16% vs 263%

Higher overall mineral density: Arctic CharCumulative Daily Value percentage: 66% vs 84%

Arctic Char

Salvelinus alpinus

Nutrient / Metric	Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g)	Arctic Char (100g)
Calories	146 kcal	140 kcal
Protein	20.5g	20g
Fats	6.2g	6g
Carbohydrates	0g	0g
Dietary Fiber	0g	0g
GIGlycemic Index	0	0
Water Content	70%	75%

Nutritional Verdict

Both superfoods are highly complementary and offer balanced biological profiles for clinical dietary plans.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.

•High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support cardiovascular health and reduce inflammation.

Arctic Char

Arctic char is a cold-water fish related to salmon and trout, known for its delicate flavor and high nutritional value. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, protein, and essential vitamins and minerals.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which are beneficial for heart health and reducing inflammation.

•High protein content supports muscle growth and repair, making it an excellent choice for athletes.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet provides 146 calories per 100g, compared to 140 calories in Arctic Char. This makes Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet more energy-dense, whereas Arctic Char stands out for its lower caloric footprint.

In the protein matrix, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet delivers 20.5g of protein per 100g, while Arctic Char records 20g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Arctic Char has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Arctic Char. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet's profile is highly notable for: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).

Conversely, Arctic Char stands out especially in: vitamin-b12 (5µg, 208% VDR) and vitamin-d (11µg, 55% VDR) and selenium (30µg, 55% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100 vs Arctic Char: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Arctic Char due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Arctic Char is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Arctic Char stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet and Arctic Char together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.