Red Rice vs Macrostachya Oat
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Red Rice and Macrostachya Oat. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Red Rice
Oryza sativa

Macrostachya Oat
Avena macrostachya
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Red Rice (100g) | Macrostachya Oat (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Protein | 2.7g | 16.9g |
| Fats | 1g | 6.9g |
| Carbohydrates | 25g | 66.3g |
| Dietary Fiber | 2g | 10.6g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 55 | 55 |
| Water Content | 12% | 8% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Macrostachya Oat is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Red Rice
Red rice is a whole grain that retains its bran layer, providing a rich source of nutrients and antioxidants. It is known for its nutty flavor and chewy texture.
Macrostachya Oat
Avena macrostachya, commonly known as Macrostachya oat, is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein and fiber content, making it an excellent choice for a balanced diet.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Red Rice provides 123 calories per 100g, compared to 389 calories in Macrostachya Oat. This makes Macrostachya Oat more energy-dense, converting Red Rice into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Red Rice delivers 2.7g of protein per 100g, while Macrostachya Oat records 16.9g. If looking to optimize muscle protein synthesis, Macrostachya Oat is superior in this macronutrient.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Red Rice has 25g of carbs with an estimated GI of 55, whereas Macrostachya Oat has 66.3g with a GI of 55. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.
Regarding gut health, Red Rice features 2g of fiber per 100g, compared to 10.6g in Macrostachya Oat. Macrostachya Oat promotes greater microbiome health and regularity.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Red Rice's profile is highly notable for: manganese (0.9mg, 45% VDR) and copper (0.1mg, 11% VDR) and vitamin b5 (pantothenic acid) (0.5mg, 10% VDR).
Conversely, Macrostachya Oat stands out especially in: vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.76mg, 63% VDR) and phosphorus (410mg, 58% VDR) and magnesium (177mg, 44% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
Red Rice contains highly valuable active principles: Anthocyanins (Natural pigments that provide antioxidant properties.).
Red Rice posee propiedades descritas como: Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, Digestive.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Red Rice: 80/100 vs Macrostachya Oat: 100/100), we determine that Macrostachya Oat presents a globally denser nutrient profile.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Red Rice due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Macrostachya Oat because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Macrostachya Oat is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Macrostachya Oat stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.











