Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Red Royal Quinoa vs Macrostachya Oat

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Red Royal Quinoa and Macrostachya Oat. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Red Royal Quinoa

Chenopodium quinoa

100Density Points

368 kcalCalories

14.1gProtein

7gDietary Fiber

Macrostachya Oat

Avena macrostachya

100Density Points

389 kcalCalories

16.9gProtein

10.6gDietary Fiber

Red Royal Quinoa

Macrostachya Oat

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Red Royal Quinoa368 kcal vs 389 kcal (difference of 5%)

Higher protein density: Macrostachya Oat14.1g vs 16.9g (Macrostachya Oat has 17% more)

Higher fiber content: Macrostachya Oat7g vs 10.6g (Macrostachya Oat has 34% more)

Lower glycemic impact: Red Royal QuinoaGlycemic Index: 53 vs 55 (difference of 2 points)

Higher overall vitamin density: Macrostachya OatCumulative Daily Value percentage: 19% vs 88%

Higher overall mineral density: Macrostachya OatCumulative Daily Value percentage: 41% vs 128%

Macrostachya Oat

Avena macrostachya

Nutrient / Metric	Red Royal Quinoa (100g)	Macrostachya Oat (100g)
Calories	368 kcal	389 kcal
Protein	14.1g	16.9g
Fats	6.1g	6.9g
Carbohydrates	64.2g	66.3g
Dietary Fiber	7g	10.6g
GIGlycemic Index	53	55
Water Content	13%	8%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Macrostachya Oat is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Red Royal Quinoa

Red Royal Quinoa is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein content and rich flavor. It is gluten-free and packed with essential amino acids, making it an excellent choice for a balanced diet.

•Rich in protein, providing all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein source for vegetarians and vegans.

•High in dietary fiber, which aids in digestion and helps maintain a healthy weight by promoting satiety.

Macrostachya Oat

Avena macrostachya, commonly known as Macrostachya oat, is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein and fiber content, making it an excellent choice for a balanced diet.

•Rich in dietary fiber, Avena macrostachya supports digestive health and helps maintain stable blood sugar levels.

•High protein content aids in muscle repair and growth, making it beneficial for athletes and active individuals.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Red Royal Quinoa provides 368 calories per 100g, compared to 389 calories in Macrostachya Oat. This makes Macrostachya Oat more energy-dense, converting Red Royal Quinoa into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Red Royal Quinoa delivers 14.1g of protein per 100g, while Macrostachya Oat records 16.9g. If looking to optimize muscle protein synthesis, Macrostachya Oat is superior in this macronutrient.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Red Royal Quinoa has 64.2g of carbs with an estimated GI of 53, whereas Macrostachya Oat has 66.3g with a GI of 55. Red Royal Quinoa provides slower glucose absorption, ideal for preventing glucose spikes.

Regarding gut health, Red Royal Quinoa features 7g of fiber per 100g, compared to 10.6g in Macrostachya Oat. Macrostachya Oat promotes greater microbiome health and regularity.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Red Royal Quinoa's profile is highly notable for: iron (4.6mg, 25% VDR) and magnesium (64mg, 16% VDR) and Vitamin E (2.1mg, 14% VDR).

Conversely, Macrostachya Oat stands out especially in: vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.76mg, 63% VDR) and phosphorus (410mg, 58% VDR) and magnesium (177mg, 44% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Red Royal Quinoa: 100/100 vs Macrostachya Oat: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Red Royal Quinoa due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Macrostachya Oat because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Red Royal Quinoa is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Macrostachya Oat stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Red Royal Quinoa and Macrostachya Oat together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.