Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Red Royal Quinoa vs Amaranth

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Red Royal Quinoa and Amaranth. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Red Royal Quinoa

Chenopodium quinoa

100Density Points

368 kcalCalories

14.1gProtein

7gDietary Fiber

Amaranth

Amaranthus spp.

100Density Points

371 kcalCalories

13.6gProtein

6.7gDietary Fiber

Red Royal Quinoa

Amaranth

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Red Royal Quinoa368 kcal vs 371 kcal (difference of 1%)

Higher protein density: Red Royal Quinoa14.1g vs 13.6g (Red Royal Quinoa has 4% more)

Higher fiber content: Red Royal Quinoa7g vs 6.7g (Red Royal Quinoa has 4% more)

Lower glycemic impact: AmaranthGlycemic Index: 53 vs 35 (difference of 18 points)

Higher overall vitamin density: Red Royal QuinoaCumulative Daily Value percentage: 19% vs 11%

Higher overall mineral density: AmaranthCumulative Daily Value percentage: 41% vs 199%

Amaranth

Amaranthus spp.

Nutrient / Metric	Red Royal Quinoa (100g)	Amaranth (100g)
Calories	368 kcal	371 kcal
Protein	14.1g	13.6g
Fats	6.1g	7g
Carbohydrates	64.2g	65g
Dietary Fiber	7g	6.7g
GIGlycemic Index	53	35
Water Content	13%	8%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Red Royal Quinoa is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Red Royal Quinoa

Red Royal Quinoa is a nutrient-dense grain known for its high protein content and rich flavor. It is gluten-free and packed with essential amino acids, making it an excellent choice for a balanced diet.

•Rich in protein, providing all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein source for vegetarians and vegans.

•High in dietary fiber, which aids in digestion and helps maintain a healthy weight by promoting satiety.

Amaranth

Amaranth is a highly nutritious grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a variety of health benefits, making it a popular choice among health-conscious individuals.

•Rich in protein and essential amino acids, amaranth supports muscle growth and repair.

•Contains antioxidants that help combat oxidative stress and inflammation in the body.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Red Royal Quinoa provides 368 calories per 100g, compared to 371 calories in Amaranth. This makes Amaranth more energy-dense, converting Red Royal Quinoa into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Red Royal Quinoa delivers 14.1g of protein per 100g, while Amaranth records 13.6g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Red Royal Quinoa offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Red Royal Quinoa has 64.2g of carbs with an estimated GI of 53, whereas Amaranth has 65g with a GI of 35. Amaranth results in a more controlled, steady insulin response.

Regarding gut health, Red Royal Quinoa features 7g of fiber per 100g, compared to 6.7g in Amaranth. Consuming Red Royal Quinoa significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Red Royal Quinoa's profile is highly notable for: iron (4.6mg, 25% VDR) and magnesium (64mg, 16% VDR) and Vitamin E (2.1mg, 14% VDR).

Conversely, Amaranth stands out especially in: magnesium (270mg, 68% VDR) and phosphorus (410mg, 58% VDR) and iron (7.6mg, 42% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Red Royal Quinoa: 100/100 vs Amaranth: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Red Royal Quinoa due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Red Royal Quinoa because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amaranth is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amaranth stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Red Royal Quinoa and Amaranth together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.