Home/Nutritional Comparison
Back to Home
Direct Comparison Profile

Pike vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Pike and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Pike

Pike

Esox lucius

100Density Points
105 kcalCalories
22gProtein
0gDietary Fiber
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

100Density Points
146 kcalCalories
20.5gProtein
0gDietary Fiber
Caloric EfficiencyProtein DensityFiber RichnessLow Glycemic ImpactVitamin DensityMineral Density
Pike
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Pike105 kcal vs 146 kcal (difference of 28%)
Higher protein density: Pike22g vs 20.5g (Pike has 7% more)
Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g
Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0
Higher overall vitamin density: PikeCumulative Daily Value percentage: 38% vs 16%
Higher overall mineral density: PikeCumulative Daily Value percentage: 84% vs 66%
Nutrient / MetricPike (100g)Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g)
Calories105 kcal 146 kcal
Protein22g 20.5g
Fats1g 6.2g
Carbohydrates0g 0g
Dietary Fiber0g 0g
GIGlycemic Index0 0
Water Content80% 70%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Pike is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Pike

Pike is a freshwater fish known for its elongated body and sharp teeth. It is a rich source of protein and essential nutrients, making it a popular choice for health-conscious consumers.

High in protein, pike supports muscle growth and repair, making it an excellent choice for athletes and active individuals.
Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, pike contributes to heart health by reducing inflammation and lowering blood pressure.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.

High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.
Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support cardiovascular health and reduce inflammation.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Pike provides 105 calories per 100g, compared to 146 calories in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. This makes Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet more energy-dense, converting Pike into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Pike delivers 22g of protein per 100g, while Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet records 20.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Pike offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Pike has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Pike features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Pike's profile is highly notable for: selenium (30µg, 55% VDR) and vitamin-b12 (2µg, 33% VDR) and phosphorus (200mg, 29% VDR).

Conversely, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out especially in: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Pike: 100/100 vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Pike due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Pike because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Pike and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.