Pike vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Pike and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Pike
Esox lucius

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Seriola lalandi
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Pike (100g) | Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Protein | 22g | 20.5g |
| Fats | 1g | 6.2g |
| Carbohydrates | 0g | 0g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 0 | 0 |
| Water Content | 80% | 70% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Pike is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Pike
Pike is a freshwater fish known for its elongated body and sharp teeth. It is a rich source of protein and essential nutrients, making it a popular choice for health-conscious consumers.
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Pike provides 105 calories per 100g, compared to 146 calories in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. This makes Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet more energy-dense, converting Pike into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Pike delivers 22g of protein per 100g, while Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet records 20.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Pike offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Pike has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.
Regarding gut health, Pike features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Pike's profile is highly notable for: selenium (30µg, 55% VDR) and vitamin-b12 (2µg, 33% VDR) and phosphorus (200mg, 29% VDR).
Conversely, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out especially in: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Pike: 100/100 vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Pike due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Pike because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
Pike
Pike
Pike
Pike
Pike
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.

