Home/Nutritional Comparison
Back to Home
Direct Comparison Profile

Mackerel vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Mackerel and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Mackerel

Mackerel

Scomber scombrus

100Density Points
305 kcalCalories
25gProtein
0gDietary Fiber
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

100Density Points
146 kcalCalories
20.5gProtein
0gDietary Fiber
Caloric EfficiencyProtein DensityFiber RichnessLow Glycemic ImpactVitamin DensityMineral Density
Mackerel
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet305 kcal vs 146 kcal (difference of 109%)
Higher protein density: Mackerel25g vs 20.5g (Mackerel has 22% more)
Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g
Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0
Higher overall vitamin density: MackerelCumulative Daily Value percentage: 407% vs 16%
Higher overall mineral density: MackerelCumulative Daily Value percentage: 93% vs 66%
Nutrient / MetricMackerel (100g)Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g)
Calories305 kcal 146 kcal
Protein25g 20.5g
Fats22g 6.2g
Carbohydrates0g 0g
Dietary Fiber0g 0g
GIGlycemic Index0 0
Water Content61% 70%

Nutritional Verdict

Both superfoods are highly complementary and offer balanced biological profiles for clinical dietary plans.

Mackerel

Mackerel is a nutrient-dense fish known for its high omega-3 fatty acid content, which supports heart health and reduces inflammation. It is also an excellent source of protein and essential vitamins.

Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which are beneficial for cardiovascular health and may reduce the risk of heart disease.
High in protein, supporting muscle growth and repair, making it an excellent choice for athletes and active individuals.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.

High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.
Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support cardiovascular health and reduce inflammation.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Mackerel provides 305 calories per 100g, compared to 146 calories in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. This makes Mackerel more energy-dense, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out for its lower caloric footprint.

In the protein matrix, Mackerel delivers 25g of protein per 100g, while Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet records 20.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Mackerel offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Mackerel has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Mackerel features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Mackerel's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-b12 (19mcg, 317% VDR) and vitamin-d (360IU, 90% VDR) and selenium (40mcg, 57% VDR).

Conversely, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out especially in: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Mackerel: 100/100 vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Mackerel because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Mackerel and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.