Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Giant Sea Bass vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Giant Sea Bass and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Giant Sea Bass

Stereolepis gigas

100Density Points

145 kcalCalories

20.5gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

100Density Points

146 kcalCalories

20.5gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Giant Sea Bass

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Giant Sea Bass145 kcal vs 146 kcal (difference of 1%)

Equivalent protein content20.5g vs 20.5g

Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g

Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0

Higher overall vitamin density: Giant Sea BassCumulative Daily Value percentage: 243% vs 16%

Higher overall mineral density: Giant Sea BassCumulative Daily Value percentage: 102% vs 66%

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

Nutrient / Metric	Giant Sea Bass (100g)	Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g)
Calories	145 kcal	146 kcal
Protein	20.5g	20.5g
Fats	5.2g	6.2g
Carbohydrates	0g	0g
Dietary Fiber	0g	0g
GIGlycemic Index	0	0
Water Content	75%	70%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Giant Sea Bass is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Giant Sea Bass

The Giant Sea Bass is a large marine fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor, making it a popular choice in culinary dishes. It is rich in protein and essential nutrients, contributing to a balanced diet.

•High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support heart health and reduce inflammation.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.

•High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support cardiovascular health and reduce inflammation.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Giant Sea Bass provides 145 calories per 100g, compared to 146 calories in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. This makes Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet more energy-dense, converting Giant Sea Bass into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Giant Sea Bass delivers 20.5g of protein per 100g, while Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet records 20.5g. Both foods supply the same amount of amino acids per 100g.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Giant Sea Bass has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Giant Sea Bass features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Giant Sea Bass's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-d (570IU, 143% VDR) and vitamin-b12 (2.4µg, 100% VDR) and selenium (40µg, 73% VDR).

Conversely, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out especially in: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Giant Sea Bass: 100/100 vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Giant Sea Bass due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Giant Sea Bass and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.