Home/Nutritional Comparison
Back to Home
Direct Comparison Profile

Wahoo Ono Fillet vs Albacore White Tuna

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Wahoo Ono Fillet and Albacore White Tuna. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Wahoo Ono Fillet

Wahoo Ono Fillet

Acanthocybium solandri

100Density Points
130 kcalCalories
28gProtein
0gDietary Fiber
Albacore White Tuna

Albacore White Tuna

Thunnus alalunga

100Density Points
132 kcalCalories
28gProtein
0gDietary Fiber
Caloric EfficiencyProtein DensityFiber RichnessLow Glycemic ImpactVitamin DensityMineral Density
Wahoo Ono Fillet
Albacore White Tuna

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Wahoo Ono Fillet130 kcal vs 132 kcal (difference of 2%)
Equivalent protein content28g vs 28g
Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g
Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0
Higher overall vitamin density: Wahoo Ono FilletCumulative Daily Value percentage: 243% vs 15%
Higher overall mineral density: Wahoo Ono FilletCumulative Daily Value percentage: 102% vs 75%
Nutrient / MetricWahoo Ono Fillet (100g)Albacore White Tuna (100g)
Calories130 kcal 132 kcal
Protein28g 28g
Fats2g 1g
Carbohydrates0g 0g
Dietary Fiber0g 0g
GIGlycemic Index0 0
Water Content75% 70%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Wahoo Ono Fillet is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Wahoo Ono Fillet

Wahoo, also known as Ono, is a highly sought-after fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in protein and omega-3 fatty acids, making it a nutritious choice for a healthy diet.

High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.
Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support heart health and reduce inflammation.

Albacore White Tuna

Albacore white tuna is a rich source of high-quality protein and omega-3 fatty acids, known for its mild flavor and firm texture. It is often used in salads, sandwiches, and sushi.

Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which are essential for heart health and reducing inflammation.
High protein content supports muscle growth and repair, making it an excellent choice for athletes.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Wahoo Ono Fillet provides 130 calories per 100g, compared to 132 calories in Albacore White Tuna. This makes Albacore White Tuna more energy-dense, converting Wahoo Ono Fillet into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Wahoo Ono Fillet delivers 28g of protein per 100g, while Albacore White Tuna records 28g. Both foods supply the same amount of amino acids per 100g.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Wahoo Ono Fillet has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Albacore White Tuna has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Wahoo Ono Fillet features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Albacore White Tuna. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Wahoo Ono Fillet's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-d (570IU, 143% VDR) and vitamin-b12 (2.4µg, 100% VDR) and selenium (40µg, 73% VDR).

Conversely, Albacore White Tuna stands out especially in: selenium (36mcg, 65% VDR) and vitamin-d (3mcg, 15% VDR) and potassium (350mg, 10% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Wahoo Ono Fillet: 100/100 vs Albacore White Tuna: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Wahoo Ono Fillet due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Albacore White Tuna because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Albacore White Tuna is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Albacore White Tuna stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Wahoo Ono Fillet and Albacore White Tuna together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.