Tri-Color Quinoa vs Amaranth
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Tri-Color Quinoa and Amaranth. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Tri-Color Quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa

Amaranth
Amaranthus spp.
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Tri-Color Quinoa (100g) | Amaranth (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Protein | 14.1g | 13.6g |
| Fats | 6.1g | 7g |
| Carbohydrates | 64.2g | 65g |
| Dietary Fiber | 7g | 6.7g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 53 | 35 |
| Water Content | 13% | 8% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Tri-Color Quinoa is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Tri-Color Quinoa
Tri-color quinoa is a nutrient-dense grain known for its rich protein content and diverse amino acid profile. It is a gluten-free option that provides essential nutrients and antioxidants.
Amaranth
Amaranth is a highly nutritious grain known for its high protein content and rich array of vitamins and minerals. It is gluten-free and offers a variety of health benefits, making it a popular choice among health-conscious individuals.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Tri-Color Quinoa provides 368 calories per 100g, compared to 371 calories in Amaranth. This makes Amaranth more energy-dense, converting Tri-Color Quinoa into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Tri-Color Quinoa delivers 14.1g of protein per 100g, while Amaranth records 13.6g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Tri-Color Quinoa offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Tri-Color Quinoa has 64.2g of carbs with an estimated GI of 53, whereas Amaranth has 65g with a GI of 35. Amaranth results in a more controlled, steady insulin response.
Regarding gut health, Tri-Color Quinoa features 7g of fiber per 100g, compared to 6.7g in Amaranth. Consuming Tri-Color Quinoa significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Tri-Color Quinoa's profile is highly notable for: magnesium (64mg, 16% VDR) and iron (2.8mg, 15% VDR) and Vitamin E (2mg, 10% VDR).
Conversely, Amaranth stands out especially in: magnesium (270mg, 68% VDR) and phosphorus (410mg, 58% VDR) and iron (7.6mg, 42% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Tri-Color Quinoa: 99/100 vs Amaranth: 100/100), we determine that Amaranth presents a globally denser nutrient profile.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Tri-Color Quinoa due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Tri-Color Quinoa because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amaranth is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amaranth stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
Tri-Color Quinoa
Tri-Color Quinoa
Tri-Color Quinoa
Tri-Color Quinoa
Tri-Color Quinoa
Amaranth
Amaranth
Amaranth
Amaranth
Amaranth
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.

