Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet vs Arctic Char Fillet

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet and Arctic Char Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

100Density Points

146 kcalCalories

20.5gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Arctic Char Fillet

Salvelinus alpinus

100Density Points

206 kcalCalories

22.5gProtein

0gDietary Fiber

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Arctic Char Fillet

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet146 kcal vs 206 kcal (difference of 29%)

Higher protein density: Arctic Char Fillet20.5g vs 22.5g (Arctic Char Fillet has 9% more)

Equivalent fiber content0g vs 0g

Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 0 vs 0

Higher overall vitamin density: Arctic Char FilletCumulative Daily Value percentage: 16% vs 175%

Higher overall mineral density: Arctic Char FilletCumulative Daily Value percentage: 66% vs 75%

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Seriola lalandi

Arctic Char Fillet

Salvelinus alpinus

Nutrient / Metric	Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g)	Arctic Char Fillet (100g)
Calories	146 kcal	206 kcal
Protein	20.5g	22.5g
Fats	6.2g	12g
Carbohydrates	0g	0g
Dietary Fiber	0g	0g
GIGlycemic Index	0	0
Water Content	70%	70%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Arctic Char Fillet is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet

Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.

•High in protein, which is essential for muscle repair and growth.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which support cardiovascular health and reduce inflammation.

Arctic Char Fillet

Arctic char is a cold-water fish that is closely related to salmon and trout, known for its delicate flavor and high omega-3 fatty acid content. Pan-searing enhances its natural flavors while providing a crispy texture.

•Rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which are essential for heart health and reducing inflammation.

•High in protein, supporting muscle growth and repair.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet provides 146 calories per 100g, compared to 206 calories in Arctic Char Fillet. This makes Arctic Char Fillet more energy-dense, converting Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet delivers 20.5g of protein per 100g, while Arctic Char Fillet records 22.5g. If looking to optimize muscle protein synthesis, Arctic Char Fillet is superior in this macronutrient.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Arctic Char Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Arctic Char Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet's profile is highly notable for: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).

Conversely, Arctic Char Fillet stands out especially in: vitamin-b12 (3µg, 125% VDR) and selenium (30µg, 55% VDR) and vitamin-d (10µg, 50% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100 vs Arctic Char Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Arctic Char Fillet because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Arctic Char Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Arctic Char Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet and Arctic Char Fillet together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.