Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Swedish Brown Beans vs Anasazi Bean

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Swedish Brown Beans and Anasazi Bean. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Swedish Brown Beans

Phaseolus vulgaris

100Density Points

337 kcalCalories

21.6gProtein

25.3gDietary Fiber

Anasazi Bean

Phaseolus vulgaris

100Density Points

130 kcalCalories

8gProtein

9gDietary Fiber

Swedish Brown Beans

Anasazi Bean

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Anasazi Bean337 kcal vs 130 kcal (difference of 159%)

Higher protein density: Swedish Brown Beans21.6g vs 8g (Swedish Brown Beans has 170% more)

Higher fiber content: Swedish Brown Beans25.3g vs 9g (Swedish Brown Beans has 181% more)

Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 30 vs 30

Equivalent vitamin densityCumulative Daily Value percentage: 38% vs 38%

Higher overall mineral density: Swedish Brown BeansCumulative Daily Value percentage: 35% vs 25%

Anasazi Bean

Phaseolus vulgaris

Nutrient / Metric	Swedish Brown Beans (100g)	Anasazi Bean (100g)
Calories	337 kcal	130 kcal
Protein	21.6g	8g
Fats	0.8g	0.5g
Carbohydrates	60.3g	23g
Dietary Fiber	25.3g	9g
GIGlycemic Index	30	30
Water Content	10%	10%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Swedish Brown Beans is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Swedish Brown Beans

Swedish brown beans are a nutritious legume known for their high protein and fiber content, making them an excellent choice for plant-based diets. They are versatile in cooking and provide essential vitamins and minerals.

•Rich in protein, Swedish brown beans support muscle growth and repair, making them ideal for vegetarians and vegans.

•High fiber content aids in digestion and helps maintain stable blood sugar levels, reducing the risk of diabetes.

Anasazi Bean

The Anasazi bean is a traditional Native American legume known for its unique mottled appearance and rich flavor. It is high in protein and fiber, making it a nutritious addition to various dishes.

•Rich in dietary fiber, Anasazi beans promote digestive health and help maintain stable blood sugar levels.

•High protein content supports muscle repair and growth, making it an excellent choice for vegetarians and vegans.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Swedish Brown Beans provides 337 calories per 100g, compared to 130 calories in Anasazi Bean. This makes Swedish Brown Beans more energy-dense, whereas Anasazi Bean stands out for its lower caloric footprint.

In the protein matrix, Swedish Brown Beans delivers 21.6g of protein per 100g, while Anasazi Bean records 8g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Swedish Brown Beans offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Swedish Brown Beans has 60.3g of carbs with an estimated GI of 30, whereas Anasazi Bean has 23g with a GI of 30. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Swedish Brown Beans features 25.3g of fiber per 100g, compared to 9g in Anasazi Bean. Consuming Swedish Brown Beans significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Swedish Brown Beans's profile is highly notable for: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and iron (3.7mg, 20% VDR) and magnesium (60mg, 15% VDR).

Conversely, Anasazi Bean stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and iron (2.5mg, 14% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Swedish Brown Beans: 100/100 vs Anasazi Bean: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Anasazi Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Swedish Brown Beans because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Swedish Brown Beans is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Anasazi Bean stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Swedish Brown Beans and Anasazi Bean together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.