Red Mullet vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Red Mullet and Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Red Mullet
Mullus barbatus
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Seriola lalandi
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Red Mullet (100g) | Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 kcal | 146 kcal |
| Protein | 20g | 20.5g |
| Fats | 4g | 6.2g |
| Carbohydrates | 0g | 0g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 0 | 0 |
| Water Content | 75% | 70% |
Nutritional Verdict
Both superfoods are highly complementary and offer balanced biological profiles for clinical dietary plans.
Red Mullet
Red mullet is a flavorful fish known for its delicate texture and rich taste. It is a good source of protein and essential nutrients, making it a popular choice in Mediterranean cuisine.
Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet
Amberjack yellowtail fillet is a lean, high-protein fish known for its firm texture and mild flavor. It is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, making it a heart-healthy choice.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Red Mullet provides 120 calories per 100g, compared to 146 calories in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. This makes Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet more energy-dense, converting Red Mullet into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Red Mullet delivers 20g of protein per 100g, while Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet records 20.5g. If looking to optimize muscle protein synthesis, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is superior in this macronutrient.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Red Mullet has 0g of carbs with an estimated GI of 0, whereas Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet has 0g with a GI of 0. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.
Regarding gut health, Red Mullet features 0g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0g in Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Red Mullet's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-b12 (8.9µg, 370% VDR) and selenium (34µg, 62% VDR) and phosphorus (200mg, 29% VDR).
Conversely, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out especially in: selenium (36.5mcg, 66% VDR) and vitamin-d (3.2mcg, 16% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Red Mullet: 100/100 vs Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Red Mullet due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Amberjack Yellowtail Fillet stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.