Pima Tepary Bean vs Anasazi Bean
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Pima Tepary Bean and Anasazi Bean. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Pima Tepary Bean
Phaseolus acutifolius
Anasazi Bean
Phaseolus vulgaris
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Pima Tepary Bean (100g) | Anasazi Bean (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Protein | 8g | 8g |
| Fats | 0.5g | 0.5g |
| Carbohydrates | 24g | 23g |
| Dietary Fiber | 9g | 9g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 30 | 30 |
| Water Content | 10% | 10% |
Nutritional Verdict
Both superfoods are highly complementary and offer balanced biological profiles for clinical dietary plans.
Pima Tepary Bean
The Pima Tepary Bean is a drought-resistant legume native to the southwestern United States and Mexico, known for its high protein content and unique flavor. It is a staple in traditional diets and is recognized for its nutritional benefits and adaptability to arid climates.
Anasazi Bean
The Anasazi bean is a traditional Native American legume known for its unique mottled appearance and rich flavor. It is high in protein and fiber, making it a nutritious addition to various dishes.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Pima Tepary Bean provides 130 calories per 100g, compared to 130 calories in Anasazi Bean. Both foods exhibit the exact same caloric density, an interesting metabolic alignment.
In the protein matrix, Pima Tepary Bean delivers 8g of protein per 100g, while Anasazi Bean records 8g. Both foods supply the same amount of amino acids per 100g.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Pima Tepary Bean has 24g of carbs with an estimated GI of 30, whereas Anasazi Bean has 23g with a GI of 30. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.
Regarding gut health, Pima Tepary Bean features 9g of fiber per 100g, compared to 9g in Anasazi Bean. Both supply identical amounts of dietary fiber.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Pima Tepary Bean's profile is highly notable for: iron (2.5mg, 14% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR) and vitamin b6 (pyridoxine) (0.1mg, 5% VDR).
Conversely, Anasazi Bean stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and iron (2.5mg, 14% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Pima Tepary Bean: 100/100 vs Anasazi Bean: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Anasazi Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Anasazi Bean because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Anasazi Bean is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Anasazi Bean stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.