Pima Tepary Bean vs Adzuki Bean
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Pima Tepary Bean and Adzuki Bean. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Pima Tepary Bean
Phaseolus acutifolius
Adzuki Bean
Vigna angularis
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Pima Tepary Bean (100g) | Adzuki Bean (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Protein | 8g | 7.5g |
| Fats | 0.5g | 0.2g |
| Carbohydrates | 24g | 25.4g |
| Dietary Fiber | 9g | 7.3g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 30 | 25 |
| Water Content | 10% | 10.5% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Pima Tepary Bean is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Pima Tepary Bean
The Pima Tepary Bean is a drought-resistant legume native to the southwestern United States and Mexico, known for its high protein content and unique flavor. It is a staple in traditional diets and is recognized for its nutritional benefits and adaptability to arid climates.
Adzuki Bean
Adzuki beans are small, red legumes known for their sweet flavor and high nutritional value. They are rich in protein, fiber, and essential vitamins and minerals, making them a popular choice in various cuisines.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Pima Tepary Bean provides 130 calories per 100g, compared to 128 calories in Adzuki Bean. This makes Pima Tepary Bean more energy-dense, whereas Adzuki Bean stands out for its lower caloric footprint.
In the protein matrix, Pima Tepary Bean delivers 8g of protein per 100g, while Adzuki Bean records 7.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Pima Tepary Bean offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Pima Tepary Bean has 24g of carbs with an estimated GI of 30, whereas Adzuki Bean has 25.4g with a GI of 25. Adzuki Bean results in a more controlled, steady insulin response.
Regarding gut health, Pima Tepary Bean features 9g of fiber per 100g, compared to 7.3g in Adzuki Bean. Consuming Pima Tepary Bean significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Pima Tepary Bean's profile is highly notable for: iron (2.5mg, 14% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR) and vitamin b6 (pyridoxine) (0.1mg, 5% VDR).
Conversely, Adzuki Bean stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.2mg, 15% VDR) and magnesium (60mg, 15% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Pima Tepary Bean: 100/100 vs Adzuki Bean: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Adzuki Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Pima Tepary Bean because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Adzuki Bean is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Adzuki Bean stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.