Field Bean vs Bambara Groundnuts
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Field Bean and Bambara Groundnuts. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Field Bean
Phaseolus vulgaris

Bambara Groundnuts
Vigna subterranea
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Field Bean (100g) | Bambara Groundnuts (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 127 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Protein | 8.7g | 23.2g |
| Fats | 0.5g | 14g |
| Carbohydrates | 23.7g | 57g |
| Dietary Fiber | 6.4g | 10g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 30 | 35 |
| Water Content | 10.2% | 9% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Bambara Groundnuts is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Field Bean
Field beans are a nutritious legume known for their high protein and fiber content, making them an excellent choice for a balanced diet. They are versatile in cooking and can be used in various dishes.
Bambara Groundnuts
Bambara groundnuts are a nutritious legume native to Africa, known for their high protein content and ability to thrive in poor soils. They are rich in essential nutrients and provide a good source of energy.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Field Bean provides 127 calories per 100g, compared to 341 calories in Bambara Groundnuts. This makes Bambara Groundnuts more energy-dense, converting Field Bean into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Field Bean delivers 8.7g of protein per 100g, while Bambara Groundnuts records 23.2g. If looking to optimize muscle protein synthesis, Bambara Groundnuts is superior in this macronutrient.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Field Bean has 23.7g of carbs with an estimated GI of 30, whereas Bambara Groundnuts has 57g with a GI of 35. Field Bean provides slower glucose absorption, ideal for preventing glucose spikes.
Regarding gut health, Field Bean features 6.4g of fiber per 100g, compared to 10g in Bambara Groundnuts. Bambara Groundnuts promotes greater microbiome health and regularity.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Field Bean's profile is highly notable for: iron (2.9mg, 16% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR) and vitamin b6 (pyridoxine) (0.1mg, 5% VDR).
Conversely, Bambara Groundnuts stands out especially in: magnesium (200mg, 50% VDR) and phosphorus (300mg, 43% VDR) and vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.4mg, 33% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Field Bean: 100/100 vs Bambara Groundnuts: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Field Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Bambara Groundnuts because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Field Bean is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Bambara Groundnuts stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.










