Field Bean vs Adzuki Beans
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Field Bean and Adzuki Beans. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Field Bean
Phaseolus vulgaris

Adzuki Beans
Vigna angularis
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Field Bean (100g) | Adzuki Beans (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 127 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Protein | 8.7g | 7.5g |
| Fats | 0.5g | 0.2g |
| Carbohydrates | 23.7g | 25.8g |
| Dietary Fiber | 6.4g | 7.3g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 30 | 25 |
| Water Content | 10.2% | 10.2% |
Nutritional Verdict
Both superfoods are highly complementary and offer balanced biological profiles for clinical dietary plans.
Field Bean
Field beans are a nutritious legume known for their high protein and fiber content, making them an excellent choice for a balanced diet. They are versatile in cooking and can be used in various dishes.
Adzuki Beans
Adzuki beans are small, red legumes known for their sweet flavor and high nutritional value. They are rich in protein, fiber, and essential vitamins and minerals, making them a popular choice in various cuisines.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Field Bean provides 127 calories per 100g, compared to 128 calories in Adzuki Beans. This makes Adzuki Beans more energy-dense, converting Field Bean into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Field Bean delivers 8.7g of protein per 100g, while Adzuki Beans records 7.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Field Bean offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Field Bean has 23.7g of carbs with an estimated GI of 30, whereas Adzuki Beans has 25.8g with a GI of 25. Adzuki Beans results in a more controlled, steady insulin response.
Regarding gut health, Field Bean features 6.4g of fiber per 100g, compared to 7.3g in Adzuki Beans. Adzuki Beans promotes greater microbiome health and regularity.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Field Bean's profile is highly notable for: iron (2.9mg, 16% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR) and vitamin b6 (pyridoxine) (0.1mg, 5% VDR).
Conversely, Adzuki Beans stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.2mg, 15% VDR) and magnesium (60mg, 15% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Field Bean: 100/100 vs Adzuki Beans: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Field Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Field Bean because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Adzuki Beans is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Adzuki Beans stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.










