Home/Nutritional Comparison

Direct Comparison Profile

Swedish Brown Bean vs Anasazi Beans

We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Swedish Brown Bean and Anasazi Beans. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Swedish Brown Bean

Phaseolus vulgaris

100Density Points

127 kcalCalories

8.7gProtein

6.4gDietary Fiber

Anasazi Beans

Phaseolus vulgaris

100Density Points

130 kcalCalories

8.2gProtein

9gDietary Fiber

Swedish Brown Bean

Anasazi Beans

Key Nutritional Advantages

Lower caloric density: Swedish Brown Bean127 kcal vs 130 kcal (difference of 2%)

Higher protein density: Swedish Brown Bean8.7g vs 8.2g (Swedish Brown Bean has 6% more)

Higher fiber content: Anasazi Beans6.4g vs 9g (Anasazi Beans has 29% more)

Identical glycemic impactGlycemic Index: 30 vs 30

Higher overall vitamin density: Swedish Brown BeanCumulative Daily Value percentage: 40% vs 38%

Higher overall mineral density: Swedish Brown BeanCumulative Daily Value percentage: 40% vs 27%

Anasazi Beans

Phaseolus vulgaris

Nutrient / Metric	Swedish Brown Bean (100g)	Anasazi Beans (100g)
Calories	127 kcal	130 kcal
Protein	8.7g	8.2g
Fats	0.5g	0.5g
Carbohydrates	22.8g	24.9g
Dietary Fiber	6.4g	9g
GIGlycemic Index	30	30
Water Content	67%	10%

Nutritional Verdict

Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Swedish Brown Bean is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.

Swedish Brown Bean

The Swedish Brown Bean is a nutritious legume known for its rich protein content and high fiber levels, making it an excellent choice for a balanced diet.

•Rich in protein, Swedish Brown Beans provide essential amino acids necessary for muscle repair and growth.

•High fiber content aids in digestion and helps maintain stable blood sugar levels.

Anasazi Beans

Anasazi beans are a unique variety of pinto beans known for their striking red and white mottled appearance. They are rich in protein, fiber, and essential nutrients, making them a nutritious addition to various dishes.

•High in dietary fiber, Anasazi beans can aid in digestion and promote gut health.

•Rich in protein, they are an excellent plant-based protein source for vegetarians and vegans.

Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis

Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.

AI Generated Report

1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density

When evaluating energy intake, Swedish Brown Bean provides 127 calories per 100g, compared to 130 calories in Anasazi Beans. This makes Anasazi Beans more energy-dense, converting Swedish Brown Bean into an ideal choice for caloric control.

In the protein matrix, Swedish Brown Bean delivers 8.7g of protein per 100g, while Anasazi Beans records 8.2g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Swedish Brown Bean offers a clear biochemical advantage.

Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Swedish Brown Bean has 22.8g of carbs with an estimated GI of 30, whereas Anasazi Beans has 24.9g with a GI of 30. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.

Regarding gut health, Swedish Brown Bean features 6.4g of fiber per 100g, compared to 9g in Anasazi Beans. Anasazi Beans promotes greater microbiome health and regularity.

2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)

Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).

Swedish Brown Bean's profile is highly notable for: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and iron (2.9mg, 16% VDR) and phosphorus (90mg, 13% VDR).

Conversely, Anasazi Beans stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and iron (2.9mg, 16% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR).

3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds

From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.

4. AI Clinical Verdict

We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Swedish Brown Bean: 100/100 vs Anasazi Beans: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.

Weight Control / Caloric Deficit

For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Swedish Brown Bean due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.

Athletic Performance / Hypertrophy

For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Swedish Brown Bean because of its higher protein/amino acid content.

Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity

For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Anasazi Beans is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.

Cardiovascular Health / Antioxidants

For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Anasazi Beans stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.

Nutritional Synergy Clinical Tip: Consuming both Swedish Brown Bean and Anasazi Beans together in the same meal plan allows for enhanced nutrient absorption (such as Vitamin C facilitating non-heme iron assimilation) and provides a more comprehensive antioxidant defense shield.