Mung Bean vs Red Adzuki Beans
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Mung Bean and Red Adzuki Beans. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Mung Bean
Vigna radiata
Red Adzuki Beans
Vigna angularis
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Mung Bean (100g) | Red Adzuki Beans (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 347 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Protein | 24g | 7.5g |
| Fats | 0.8g | 0.2g |
| Carbohydrates | 62.6g | 25.8g |
| Dietary Fiber | 16.3g | 7.3g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 25 | 25 |
| Water Content | 10% | 10.2% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Mung Bean is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Mung Bean
Mung beans are small, green legumes known for their high protein content and rich nutritional profile. They are commonly used in Asian cuisine and are celebrated for their health benefits.
Red Adzuki Beans
Red adzuki beans are small, reddish-brown legumes known for their sweet flavor and high nutritional value. They are rich in protein, fiber, and essential minerals, making them a popular choice in various cuisines.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Mung Bean provides 347 calories per 100g, compared to 128 calories in Red Adzuki Beans. This makes Mung Bean more energy-dense, whereas Red Adzuki Beans stands out for its lower caloric footprint.
In the protein matrix, Mung Bean delivers 24g of protein per 100g, while Red Adzuki Beans records 7.5g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Mung Bean offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Mung Bean has 62.6g of carbs with an estimated GI of 25, whereas Red Adzuki Beans has 25.8g with a GI of 25. Both exert a similar glycemic impact on the bloodstream.
Regarding gut health, Mung Bean features 16.3g of fiber per 100g, compared to 7.3g in Red Adzuki Beans. Consuming Mung Bean significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Mung Bean's profile is highly notable for: folate (130µg, 33% VDR) and potassium (1246mg, 26% VDR) and iron (2.7mg, 15% VDR).
Conversely, Red Adzuki Beans stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.2mg, 15% VDR) and magnesium (60mg, 15% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Mung Bean: 100/100 vs Red Adzuki Beans: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Red Adzuki Beans due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Mung Bean because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Mung Bean is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Red Adzuki Beans stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.