Ground Sumac vs Apple
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Ground Sumac and Apple. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.
Ground Sumac
Rhus coriaria
Apple
Malus domestica
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Ground Sumac (100g) | Apple (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 30 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Protein | 1g | 0.3g |
| Fats | 0.5g | 0.2g |
| Carbohydrates | 7g | 14g |
| Dietary Fiber | 3g | 2.4g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 15 | 36 |
| Water Content | 8% | 85.56% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Ground Sumac is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Ground Sumac
Ground sumac is a tangy spice made from the dried berries of the sumac plant, commonly used in Middle Eastern cuisine. It is known for its vibrant red color and sour flavor, which adds a unique zest to dishes.
Apple
Apples are a popular fruit known for their crisp texture and sweet-tart flavor. They are rich in dietary fiber, vitamins, and antioxidants, making them a nutritious choice for a healthy diet.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Ground Sumac provides 30 calories per 100g, compared to 52 calories in Apple. This makes Apple more energy-dense, converting Ground Sumac into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Ground Sumac delivers 1g of protein per 100g, while Apple records 0.3g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Ground Sumac offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Ground Sumac has 7g of carbs with an estimated GI of 15, whereas Apple has 14g with a GI of 36. Ground Sumac provides slower glucose absorption, ideal for preventing glucose spikes.
Regarding gut health, Ground Sumac features 3g of fiber per 100g, compared to 2.4g in Apple. Consuming Ground Sumac significantly favors satiety and digestive transit.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Ground Sumac's profile is highly notable for: manganese (0.2mg, 10% VDR) and vitamin b1 (thiamine) (0.1mg, 8% VDR) and vitamin-c (5mg, 6% VDR).
Conversely, Apple stands out especially in: vitamin-c (4.6mg, 5% VDR) and potassium (107mg, 3% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
Ground Sumac contains highly valuable active principles: Tannins (May help reduce inflammation and oxidative stress.), Flavonoids (Known for their antioxidant properties.).
Ground Sumac posee propiedades descritas como: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Digestive.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Ground Sumac: 81/100 vs Apple: 84/100), we determine that Apple presents a globally denser nutrient profile.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Ground Sumac due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Ground Sumac because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Ground Sumac is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Apple stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.