Edamame vs Anasazi Beans
We scientifically analyze the biological properties of Edamame and Anasazi Beans. Review the differences in macronutrients, vitamins, minerals, and our final nutritional verdict.

Edamame
Glycine max

Anasazi Beans
Phaseolus vulgaris
Key Nutritional Advantages
| Nutrient / Metric | Edamame (100g) | Anasazi Beans (100g) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Protein | 11.9g | 8.2g |
| Fats | 5.2g | 0.5g |
| Carbohydrates | 9.9g | 24.9g |
| Dietary Fiber | 5.2g | 9g |
| GIGlycemic Index | 18 | 30 |
| Water Content | 76.5% | 10% |
Nutritional Verdict
Based on nutrient-density scores (highly bioavailable proteins, soluble prebiotic fiber, and balanced glycemic metrics), Edamame is programmatically rated superior for structural cellular health.
Edamame
Edamame are young soybeans harvested before they ripen, rich in protein and fiber, making them a nutritious snack or addition to meals.
Anasazi Beans
Anasazi beans are a unique variety of pinto beans known for their striking red and white mottled appearance. They are rich in protein, fiber, and essential nutrients, making them a nutritious addition to various dishes.
Nutritional Intelligence Comparative Analysis
Cross-clinical evaluation based on micronutrient densities, absorption profiles, and bioactive compounds.
1. Macronutrient Battle and Energy Density
When evaluating energy intake, Edamame provides 121 calories per 100g, compared to 130 calories in Anasazi Beans. This makes Anasazi Beans more energy-dense, converting Edamame into an ideal choice for caloric control.
In the protein matrix, Edamame delivers 11.9g of protein per 100g, while Anasazi Beans records 8.2g. For athletes and lean mass preservation, Edamame offers a clear biochemical advantage.
Carbohydrate structures and the Glycemic Index (GI) yield different metabolic dynamics: Edamame has 9.9g of carbs with an estimated GI of 18, whereas Anasazi Beans has 24.9g with a GI of 30. Edamame provides slower glucose absorption, ideal for preventing glucose spikes.
Regarding gut health, Edamame features 5.2g of fiber per 100g, compared to 9g in Anasazi Beans. Anasazi Beans promotes greater microbiome health and regularity.
2. Micronutrient Profile (Vitamins and Minerals)
Micronutrient analysis highlights the essential vitamins and minerals of each food, expressed as a percentage of the recommended Daily Value (%DV).
Edamame's profile is highly notable for: vitamin-k (24.8mcg, 21% VDR) and iron (2.7mg, 15% VDR) and vitamin-c (6.1mg, 7% VDR).
Conversely, Anasazi Beans stands out especially in: folate (130mcg, 33% VDR) and iron (2.9mg, 16% VDR) and magnesium (45mg, 11% VDR).
3. Medicinal Properties and Bioactive Compounds
From a phytonutrient and bioactive perspective, each superfood interacts with cellular receptors uniquely to deliver medicinal and cell-protective benefits.
4. AI Clinical Verdict
We conclude with the AI Clinical Verdict. Evaluating the Nutri-Scores (Edamame: 100/100 vs Anasazi Beans: 100/100), we determine that both foods possess an equivalent nutritional value.
For Weight Control / Caloric Deficit, the recommended food is Edamame due to its excellent volume-to-calorie ratio and hydration/fiber content.
For Muscle Gain and Athletic Performance, the biochemically advantageous option is Edamame because of its higher protein/amino acid content.
For Glycemic Control / Insulin Sensitivity, Edamame is recommended due to its low glycemic impact.
For Cardiovascular Health and Antioxidants, Anasazi Beans stands out due to its concentration of cardioprotective compounds and key minerals.
More Recommended Comparisons
Discover nutritional differences and similarities with similar foods.
More Foods to Explore
Explore the full nutritional factsheet and recommended recipes for each.










